Immunohistochemical and molecular profiles of heterogeneous components of metaplastic breast cancer: a squamous cell carcinomatous component was distinct from a spindle cell carcinomatous component.

Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC), a category of breast cancer, includes different histological types, which are occasionally mixed and heterogeneous. Considering the heterogeneity of cancer cells in a tumour mass has become highly significant, not only from a biological aspect but also for clinical management of recurrence. This study aimed to analyse the immunohistochemical and molecular profiles of each MBC component of a tumour mass. Twenty-five MBC tumours were histologically evaluated, and the most frequent MBC component (c) was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), followed by spindle cell carcinoma (SpCC). A total of 69 components of MBC and non-MBC in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections were examined for 7 markers by immunohistochemistry. SCC(c) were significantly PTEN negative and CK14 positive, and SpCC(c) were significantly E-cadherin negative and vimentin positive. Multivariate analyses revealed that immunohistochemical profiles of normal/intraductal (IC)(c), no special type (NST)(c), and MBC(c) differed; moreover, SCC(c) and SpCC(c) were distinctly grouped. PTEN gene mutation was detected only in SCC(c) (2/7), but not in SpCC(c). Next-generation sequence analyses for 2 cases with tumours containing SCC(c) demonstrated that PTEN gene mutation increased progressively from IC(c) to NST(c) to SCC(c). In conclusion, the immunohistochemical and molecular profiles of the SCC(c) of MBC are distinct from those of the SpCC(c).

Different effects of crizotinib treatment in two non-small cell lung cancer patients with SDC4::ROS1 fusion variants.

The possibility of stratifying patients according to differences in ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) fusion partners has been discussed. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological differences between two SDC4::ROS1 positive NSCLC cases who had different responses to crizotinib. Cytology and pathology samples from two NSCLC cases with SDC4::ROS1 who were diagnosed and treated with crizotinib at Nihon University Itabashi Hospital were obtained. Case 1 has been well-controlled with crizotinib for over 5 years, but case 2 was worse and overall survival was 19 months. Sequencing analysis of ROS1 fusion genes was performed by reverse-transcription-PCR and Sanger's sequencing methods. In addition, thyroid transcription factor (TTF)-1, ROS-1, Ki67, and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK)1/2 expression were investigated using immunohistochemistry. Sequencing analysis showed SDC4 exon2::ROS1 exon 32 (exon33 deleted) in case 1, and coexistence of SDC4 exon2::ROS1 exon 34 and SDC4 exon2::ROS1 exon35 in case 2. The Ki67 index was not different, but ROS1 and pERK1/2 expression levels tended to be higher in the tumor cells of case 2 than in case 1. Therapeutic response to crizotinib and patients' prognosis in ROS1 rearranged NSCLC may be related to the activation of ROS1 signaling, depending on ROS1 and pERK1/2 overexpression status, even if the ROS1 fusion partner is the same.

Correlations between class I glucose transporter expression patterns and clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Glucose transporters (GLUTs) are highly expressed in various cancers. However, the implications of these variable expression patterns are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the correlation between class I GLUT expression patterns and clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including their potential role in inflammatory signaling. METHODS: Biopsy tissues from 132 patients with NSCLC (92 adenocarcinomas [ADC] and 40 squamous cell carcinomas [SQCC]) were analyzed. mRNA expression levels of class I GLUTs (solute carrier 2A [SLC2A]1, SLC2A2, SLC2A3, and SLC2A4) and inflammation-related molecules (toll-like receptors TLR4, RelA/p65, and interleukins IL8 and IL6) were measured. Cellular localization of GLUT3 and GLUT4 was investigated using immunofluorescence. RESULTS: Single, combined, and negative GLUT (SLC2A) expression were observed in 27/92 (29.3%), 27/92 (29.3%), and 38/92 (41.3%, p < 0.001) of ADC and 8/40 (20.0%), 29/40 (72.5%, p < 0.001), and 3/40 (7.5%) of SQCC, respectively. In ADC, the single SLC2A3-expressed group had a significantly poorer prognosis, whereas the single SLC2A4-expressed group had a significantly better prognosis. The combined expression groups showed no significant difference. SLC2A expression was not correlated with SQCC prognosis. SLC2A4 expression correlated with lower IL8 expression. GLUT3 and GLUT4 expressions were localized in the tumor cytoplasm. CONCLUSIONS: In lung ADC, single SLC2A3 expression correlated with poor prognosis, whereas single SLC2A4 expression correlated with better prognosis and lower IL8 expression. GLUT3 expression, which is increased by IL8 overexpression, may be suppressed by increasing the expression of GLUT4 through decreased IL8 expression.